Civil and community action
is not a substitute for relevant, accessible, equitable health
services. In fact, civil society action itself appears to be
more effective and more sustainable when backed by an adequate
standard of health services and public health systems (Loewenson,
2000b). Neither do health services alone provide the range
of inputs needed to control public health problems. Even where
health infrastructures are available, they may not be able to:
- provide information in the
appropriate language
- ensure culturally appropriate
care
- support community networks
for prevention and follow-up of illness.
These are all important factors
in access to care (Equinet,
1998). For example, the understanding of, compliance with
and supervision of directly observed treatment systems (DOTS)
demand social capacities and roles that can be enhanced and supported
through civic organizations. |
|
|